In Defense of

The New World Translation
of the
Holy Scriptures

A BIBLE TRANSLATION PRODUCED BY JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES

John 1:1c "the word was.............."

1. John 1:1 "...and the Word was a god." Grammatically possible?
   

2. How Monotheism and the "a god" rendering of the anarthrous QEOS at John 1:1 is theologically sound.
   

3. Metzger, Colwell,
   the New World Translation and John 1:1c
   

4. More on John 1:1c: So, what of those oft quoted scholars?
   

5. Colwell's Rule: Does it have a bearing on John 1:1c?
   

6. John 1:1a "EIMI." Is, then, the Word "eternal"?
   

7. An Early Coptic Translation and John 1:1c
   

8. The "honesty" comment in the 1951 NWT Appendix.
   

9. Wallace, Countess, the New World Translation and John 1:1c
   

10. Dr.J.Beduhn: "the Word was divine."
    

11. "Inconsistencies in the Translating of QEOS in The New World Translation Bible"
    

12. A Refutable "Irrefutable Argument."
    

13. The Word was a god and qualitative nouns.(from the Greektheology archives)

14. An example of 'blatant ignorance'?
    

15. John 1:1c and Deut.32:39a harmonised.
    

16. John 1:1c and Isaiah 43:10 harmonised
    

17. A discussion regarding John 1:1c: between Dr. J. BeDuhn and R. Hommel